Are you a business that uses technology as an enabler or a technology company that focuses on an area of business? Your persepctive fundamentally changes how you approach problems and the solutions that you envision.
Adam Jacob, at ChefConf 2018, said in his keynote:
When you think about the business, when you’re faced with something that is difficult, if what you are is a bank who uses technology, you use your definition of banking to limit what’s possible with technology. Whereas if I’m at Google or Facebook, I was a technology company first so every problem is defacto a technology problem.
When i complain about other drivers and their inability to park (I used to leave postcards behind on their windshields, but it got expensive) my wife’s normal comment was something like “How does it impact you? Why do you care?”
I care because their disrespect for others bleeds over into the rest of their life. Have you ever been shoved out of the way with nary a comment from the person? Have you ever had someone cut in line without asking you first? Have you ever been behind someone with 20 items in the 7 items or less lane?
But’s more than just that, it’s the fact that when you stop caring about these things, about the small things, then it’s just a minor step to stop caring about the big things. And if you stop caring about those items then you’re just existing, you’re not living or contributing.
If LastPass is correct, I have accounts with over 470 different organizations. Each one of these organizations has some amount of personal data on me such as name, address, phone number and perhaps other information depending upon the site.
What expectations are there around the privacy of that data? More importantly, who owns that data? Who controls the data?
When you’re looking for people, whether they are contractors or staff, you need to go through some sort of interview process to see if they fit. I’m not talking about whether or not they fit inside the uniform (position) that you have for them, but whether or not they fit in both the team and the organization as a whole. You want to hire the best, but the best person that fits.
Everyone has their own definition of being burned out. I wrote a blog a number of years ago (Am I burned out?) that talked about it. I’ve taken a number of recent quizzes (unscientific) as to whether or not I am burned out:
MindTools.com I scored 67 out of 75. “You are at very severe risk of burnout – do something about this urgently”)
I was watching a movie on YouTube the other day and a scene really stuck in my mind. I won’t go into details but the phrase “death by a thousand cuts” seemed to sum up what was happening. While the details were not important, the idea that the person did not die as a result of the first cut, or the second, but was left to slowly exsanguinate seemed to resonate with me.
In my mind “death by a thousand cuts” seems to sum up the state of IT in many organizations. It’s not one thing that is causing problems, it is a multitude of smaller issues that, when combined together, cause the IT organization to struggle Continue reading “Death By A Thousand Cuts”
There is a phenomena that has really taken off in the past decade and, to be quite honest, it is quite annoying. Words, specific words, words that describes trends, words that imply a certain attitude or function, words that match what the organization is striving for, those words are being abused.
I was talking to someone recently who had been told that every business case they wrote needed to include the words “transform” and “innovation”. Why? Because the organization is trying to “transform” and become more “innovative”. They have raised specific words to a cult-like status. Continue reading “Cult of Words”
People talk about the rate of change increasing, but there is something that they fail to understand. You see, it’s not the rate of change that is causing issues with many organizations. It is not the fact that 50% of the technologies that a student learns in their first year of University are no longer applicable by the time they graduate.
None of these things are the true organization killer. None of these things have the potential to complete decimate an organization, private or public. It is not the change that is important, it is how fast your organization can assimilate that change. Continue reading “Tsunami of Change”
Fear plays an interesting role in how we develop applications. Fear of being blamed for project failure (when most projects actually fail) drives people to push the responsibility for decisions as high up in the chain as possible. After all, if your boss made the decision you can’t be blamed if something goes wrong, correct?
Many organizations handle this by creating Working Groups and Steering Committees, all in the hope that if someone else says “yes” then it is their neck on the line if the world falls apart. DevOps, however, says something different. DevOps pushes peoples buttons and gets them into an uncomfortable position. In essence: